It is well known thatÂ Massachusetts and California are test beds for legislation that are eventually rolled out on the federal level. The gun grabbing oath breakers in MA government not wanting to be outdone by their comrades in Kommiefornia have just dropped a bomb on MA gun owners and it’s citizens.
After the usual â€œassault riflesâ€ are â€œweapon of warâ€ used by â€œmass murderersâ€ anti-AR agitprop, Massachusetts Attorney General MauraÂ Healey dropped this bombshell at The Boston Globe.
The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans â€œcopies or duplicatesâ€ of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a â€œcopyâ€ or â€œduplicateâ€ weapon is. They market â€œstate compliantâ€ copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon.
That will end now. On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.
The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a â€œcopyâ€ or â€œduplicateâ€ of a prohibited weapon. If a gunâ€™s operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, itâ€™s a â€œcopyâ€ or â€œduplicate,â€ and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
See below for legal definition of an â€œassault weapon.â€ And note: theÂ AG does have the authority to make this determination; it was litigated by the pro-gun group GOAL some 12 ago.
Going by what was put out by the MA AG, this new â€œdirectiveâ€ immediately bans the sales of all new AR and AK-style style rifles in The Bay State. Massachusetts gun stores areÂ pulling all their modern sporting rifles off the shelves.
The MA AG goes on to reassure gun buyers who purchased â€œcopyâ€ or â€œduplicateâ€ â€œassault riflesâ€ that sheâ€™s not coming for their guns. At least not yet.
We recognize that most residents who purchased these guns in the past believed they were doing so legally, so this directive will not apply to possession of guns purchased before Wednesday. In the dozen years since the federal assault weapons ban lapsed, only seven states have instituted their own assault weapons ban. Many of those bans have been challenged (unsuccessfully) by the gun industry, and we anticipate our directive may be too. But our job is to enforce state laws and to keep people safe. This directive does both.
In the face of utter inaction by Congress, states have a duty to enact and enforce laws that protect people from gun violence. If Washington wonâ€™t use its power to get these guns off our streets, we will. Not only do we have the legal authority to do so, we have a moral obligation to do so.
Wrong on both counts. In any case the shit has hit the fanÂ in Massachusetts, of all places.
As per Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 140, Â§ 121, hereâ€™s The Bay Stateâ€™s definition of â€œassault weaponâ€ [emphasis added].
â€œ Assault weapon â€, shall have the same meaning as a semiautomatic assault weapon as defined in the federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(30) as appearing in such section on September 13, 1994, and shall include, but not be limited to, any of the weapons,or copies or duplicates of the weapons, of any caliber, known as: (i) Avtomat Kalashnikov (AK) (all models); (ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil; (iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC-70); (iv) Colt AR-15; (v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR and FNC; (vi) SWD M-10, M-11, M-11/9 and M-12; (vi) Steyr AUG; (vii) INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9 and TEC-22; and (viii) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as, or similar to, the Street Sweeper and Striker 12; provided, however, that the term assault weapon shall not include: (i) any of the weapons, or replicas or duplicates of such weapons, specified in appendix A to 18 U.S.C. section 922 as appearing in such appendix on September 13, 1994, as such weapons were manufactured on October 1, 1993; (ii) any weapon that is operated by manual bolt, pump, lever or slide action; (iii) any weapon that has been rendered permanently inoperable or otherwise rendered permanently unable to be designated a semiautomatic assault weapon; (iv) any weapon that was manufactured prior to the year 1899; (v) any weapon that is an antique or relic, theatrical prop or other weapon that is not capable of firing a projectile and which is not intended for use as a functional weapon and cannot be readily modified through a combination of available parts into an operable assault weapon; (vi) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds of ammunition; or (vii) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than five rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.
Ultimately, the marxist progressive gun grabbers have effectively eviscerated the intent of the US Constitution. As any gun owner knows an assault weapon is a select fire machine gun not a semiautomatic sporting rifle. Â Assault weapons were banned in 1986 and no new assault weapons have been manufactured for civilian use since that time. But why let facts get in the way of a totalitarian gun grab. The MA AG is an oath breaker and should not only be driven from office but she should be disbarred. The people of MA need to do something about this anti-american and unconstitutional law. Sadly, this will probably not be the case as most gun owners have fled to New Hampshire to escape the draconian MA gun laws.
The founding fathers and ancestors of Massachusetts citizens are rolling over in their graves today. The next step in MA will surely be an outright ban with confiscation next up on their agenda. As a political refugee from MA I am personally glad I fled that state at the first opportunity.